How Fake is Church History?, by The First Millennium Revisionist – The Unz Review

This is the second of three articles drawing attention to major structural problems in our history of Europe in the first millennium AD. In the first article (“How fake is Roman Antiquity?”), we have argued that the forgery of ancient books during the Renaissance was more widespread than usually acknowledged, so that what we think we know about the Roman Empire — including events and individuals of central importance — rests on questionable sources.

Source: How Fake is Church History?, by The First Millennium Revisionist – The Unz Review

~ by affliction-magazinedotcom on July 22, 2020.